Rcga32
I am Jim Jannard...
- 8,330
- 4,043
Looks good
- Take 30 seconds to register your free account to access deals, post topics, and view exclusive content! Register TodayJoin the largest Oakley Forum on the web!
Official Fakes/Possible Fakes Inquiry Thread (ARE THESE FAKE? POST FAKES HERE)
- Thread starter TheDutchman92
- Start date
-
- Tags
- #fake #help #lc #lc #crosshair #legit #madman #pewter 1.0 are these legit authentic authenticity batwolf black iridium lenses box c wire copper encoder ewire eye jacket eye jacket 1.0 eyejacket fake fake batwolfs fake oakleys fakeornot flack jacket flak 2.0 frame type gascan gunmetal half half jacket 2.0 help holbrook juietxmetal juliet legit legit check legit chek legitcheck m frame made in china made in usa madman mframe hybrid minute minute 1.0 minute 2 monster dog monster doggle mumbo oakley oakley flak jacket oakley minute 2.0 oakley minute code blue oakley minute gen. 2 oakley x logo oem original over the top penny pennycopper pit boss 2 pitboss plate possible fake prizm polarized question real real or fake realorfake rodman romeo 1 splice straight jacket sun glasses twire vintage vintage oakleys white
wrekkbeach
Oakley Beginner
- 2
- 53
THANK UUUMMMFrame
Oakley Beginner
M-Frame Pro eBay, real or fake?
MMMFrame
Oakley Beginner
Slash lens, came on M-Frame Pro above, claimed original. Real/Fake?
"NIPC" on nose ridge. No other tiny writing etc. anywhere else, even under glue, yes, glue
GRFMotorsports, Thanks for the help! I posted another lens in a thread here and he already ID'd it as fake.
Thanks!
Frame and Slash lens are legit although I hope it wasnt glued into the frame.MMMFrame
Oakley Beginner
@GRFMotorsports, Thanks again.
yes, it was glued. regrettably, other than the glue they look to be excellent condition. Any ideas on glue? I have read "Super Clean" or just a damp warm soap soaking. Im afraid any chemical is going to start to peel the clear coating on them. I dont have a whole lot of experience with glue on lenses but I know it doesnt take much to mess them up.HI folks.
Just purchased a pair of Oakley Madman’s to replace a pair I lost while kayaking (an expensive trip).
I found a guy on ebay, accepted an offer for $250 (he listed at $275) for a 'new' opened pair
Listing stated ‘Prism’ but I received ‘Polarized (printed both on box and left lens).
Box open, no warranty card but all other pieces seem there and authentic.
No stickers on glasses.
All in excellent shape with exception of some wear on the inner hinges which seems to be metal underneath.
Construction seems tight and theres a good spring where the arms meet the body.
In removing the arm sock its a pretty tight fit and is flush at connect point.
They weigh in at 44oz and measurements seem within 1mm.
Here’s the reason I’m questioning…
1. With my original pair, I swear they simply felt different in my hand - a bit more ‘solid’.
2. On my original pair the bridge had a steeper arch to it, so when worn the lenses seemed closer together. I actually went to an optician and had them bend the arch out a few mm’s for an improved fit.
This pair seems to not have that concern and the fit seemd a bit different (actually slightly better).
I know its not a huge amount to go on, but I want to make sure I just didn’t dump $275.
Figured I ask the enthusiasy experts for their opinions.
Thanks much for any help folks, its truly appreciated.
P.S. Sorry for a pic heavy post, wanted to get as much detail in as possible.
I think they are legit. Part number matches colorway. They are suppose to be polarized, not Prizm. They dont look new however, that would be my concern.Similar threads
