🦘Which Sellers Do You Trust? Here's Cacatman's Top 29 People I think I can trust to buy from! 😂

[Oaks 'Between The Hedges']

“Need to be deleted”

advocating for censorship now?

Articulate how I'm wrong rather than being a child trying to argue.

 

[Blockster]

"VasanGate" has shown us that this entire thread makes zero sense and should be deleted ...

+1 for deletion. 2 original members of "the list" are now removed. 6% fail rate. That ain't good.

 

[ZCForge]

Articulate how I'm wrong rather than being a child trying to argue.

Everything is right or wrong with you and that’s your issue. I’m indifferent to it being here or not. Doesn’t matter to me. I’m not about to force someone to remove a list or thread they created when it doesn’t break any rules. What did you call it? Oh yea... “being a power hungry dictator”

But I do find it cute that when I ask the same questions to you that you ask to others and point out the hypocrisy, your response is that I’m “being a child trying to argue”.

TL;DR: you don’t like the same treatment you give others... which is expected.

 

[ZCForge]

What ever happened to “if you don’t like a thread, don’t click on it!!”?

Some people can’t even keep their own **** straight

 

[Oaks 'Between The Hedges']

Everything is right or wrong with you and that’s your issue. I’m indifferent to it being here or not. Doesn’t matter to me. I’m not about to force someone to remove a list or thread they created when it doesn’t break any rules. What did you call it? Oh yea... “being a power hungry dictator”

But I do find it cute that when I ask the same questions to you that you ask to others and point out the hypocrisy, your response is that I’m “being a child trying to argue”.

TL;DR: you don’t like the same treatment you give others... which is expected.

Trying to get your lil 15 minutes of fame, its adorable.

You're missing the whole point though, naturally, because you're only here to argue.

If the op wants to accept liability on behalf of any name he includes on list than he's more than welcome to it. If not, the list shouldn't exist. That's not censorship, that's faith in ethical advertising. If he can ensure the fidelity of his list, by all means let it stand. If he can't and people could become victims of his false advertising, it shouldn't be allowed to stand.

I feel like you probably agree with that, but your obvious bias against me because of your hurt feelings brings you here merely to argue and be petty.

 

[ZCForge]

So @cacatman is monetarily responsible for the actions of anyone on this list unless he takes it down?



That is one ****ed up view, just sayin. Who here agrees with this? @cacatman?

 

[ZCForge]

It’s called “cacatmans list”. It’s his list, not yours. Basically a feedback thread for @cacatman. I guess? So are we going to make whoever leaves a positive feedback for someone be on the hook monetarily if that person does something wrong in the future?

This whole concept is twisted.

 

[Oaks 'Between The Hedges']

So @cacatman is monetarily responsible for the actions of anyone on this list unless he takes it down?



That is one ****ed up view, just sayin. Who here agrees with this? @cacatman?

Is he or is he not actively 'vouching' for the persons he includes on the list??

 

[ZCForge]

Is he or is he not actively 'vouching' for the person's he includes on the list??

Who cares if he is? Just pay G&S and it doesn’t matter who is on the damn list.

 

[Oaks 'Between The Hedges']

Who cares if he is? Just pay G&S and it doesn’t matter who is on the damn list.

Then why does the list need to exist? You're talking yourself into circles little buddy....