Official Fakes/Possible Fakes Apparel, Accessories and Goggles Inquiry Thread (ARE THESE FAKE? POST FAKES HERE)

[neardistant]

L/C Shorts

 

[Nortika]

L/C Shorts

View attachment 1239144

View attachment 1239145

Looks legit to me

 

[InternetSuburb]

Hello, is this sweatshirt real or fake? Also why isn't the country of origin listed on the tag? Thanks!

 

[Macsuk]

Fakes on eBay

 

[Macsuk]

fake

 

[Nortika]

fake
View attachment 1254576View attachment 1254577

100% fake

 

[Macsuk]

100% fake

But sellers says “Rare Collectible” must be real or Ukrainian or both…

 

[aldimashab]

hi man, i need help to legit check this icon 1.0 backpack. everything looks good to me, except the tag & tag wash (the tag is red and use reguler O, but the tagwash use static O). as far as i know the static O first introduced in early 2000, and this Icon 1.0 Backpack in mid 90s. and from what i read in this thread, oakley never use 2 different logo in one article

 

[aldimashab]

hi man, i need help to legit check this icon 1.0 backpack. everything looks good to me, except the tag & tag wash (the tag is red and use reguler O, but the tagwash use static O). as far as i know the static O first introduced in early 2000, and this Icon 1.0 Backpack in mid 90s. and from what i read in this thread, oakley never use 2 different logo in one article

View attachment 1257319

View attachment 1257320

View attachment 1257321

View attachment 1257322

View attachment 1257323

@mascuk @Nortika

 

[aldimashab]

hi man, i need help to legit check this icon 1.0 backpack. everything looks good to me, except the tag & tag wash (the tag is red and use reguler O, but the tagwash use static O). as far as i know the static O first introduced in early 2000, and this Icon 1.0 Backpack in mid 90s. and from what i read in this thread, oakley never use 2 different logo in one article

View attachment 1257319

View attachment 1257320

View attachment 1257321

View attachment 1257322

View attachment 1257323

@Macsuk