Is a 2nd gen racing jacket, not a water jacket. The ear socks are correct for that model. His pictures show racing jacket lenses, ear socks and the nose piece. Its the New Blue / Persimmon, 2nd gen racing jacket.They don't have the original ear rubbers which incorporated a lanyard:
Water Jacket New Blue / VR28
O-Review Database Colorway Listing for: Water Jacket New Blue / VR28www.o-review.com
That said, the rubbers they've been replaced with are correct in terms of the CE being on the left and 'made in USA' being on the right. Front logo looks ok but couldn't say for certain without seeing the inside of the nosebridge.
-
Take 30 seconds to register your free account to access deals, post topics, and view exclusive content! Register TodayJoin the largest Oakley Forum on the web!
Official Fakes/Possible Fakes Inquiry Thread (ARE THESE FAKE? POST FAKES HERE)
- Thread starter TheDutchman92
- Start date
-
- Tags
- #90soakleys #eyejacket #fake #flamestraightjacket #help #juliet #polished #xmetal #lc #lc #crosshair #legit #legitcheck #madman #pewter #needhelp #oakley #oakley juliet's #oakleyl #oakleylegitorfake #oakleyscar #oilrig #fakeorreal #overthetop #pleasehelp #realorfake #vintage 1.0 5 gen are these legit authentic authenticity batwolf black iridium lenses box c wire can somebody help me to check romeo 1 copper crosshair drop point e wire e-wire encoder evaluation ewire eye jacket eye jacket 1.0 eye jacket 2.0 eye jacket fmj eyejacket eyejacket 2.0 fake fake batwolfs fake oakleys fake vs real fake/legit fakeornot fire iridium flack jacket flak 2.0 font frame type gascan gen 1 gen 3 genuine product gunmetal half half jacket 2.0 help holbrook jacket japan juietxmetal juliet juliet blue legit legit check legit chek legit?? legitcheck legitorfake m frame made in china made in usa madman mag four mframe hybrid minute minute (gen 2) minute 1.0 minute 2 minutes monster dog monster doggle monsterpups mumbo new oakley oakley five oakley flak jacket oakley identification oakley juliet oakley minute oakley minute 2.0 oakley minute code blue oakley minute gen. 2 oakley x logo oakleys oem or foakley original ott over the top penny pennycopper pit boss 2 pitboss plate polished possible fake prizm polarized question real real or fake real or fake oakley realorfake recently bought rodman romeo romeo 1 silver splice straight jacket sun glasses sungalsses sunglass titanium twenty twenty crystal twenty xx twire used vintage vintage oakleys white why 3 wire wiretap 1.0 x metal x-metal xmetal zero
Jeuck233
Oakley Beginner
- 17
- 53
I had one with SKU but not 04-320, it's black with grey lens and I forgot its SKU. But the 04-320 should be ej3.0's according to o-review.
Legit
Their fake
Hi experts
These are advertised near me, but I have some concerns.
He’s advertised them as Juliets, which I originally put down to a mistake, because the SKU is 04-145 which pertains to a 24k XX model, and as far as I am aware, juliets weren’t available in this colorway.
That’s all great..thought he may have just been confused (although they do look like a Juliet frame to me), but if I’m not mistaken, the arms (if a genuine XX), should be hammers right?
To my untrained eye, they otherwise ‘seem’ ok, they have the split hinge unlike most typical fakes, there are hex screws securing the arms to the frame, however the x-metal logo is missing from the rear of the nose bridge from what I can see.
Any and all input appreciated
Last edited:
You would be correct. This is a "Juliet" frame in a colorway they didn't make, with a XX model number. That alone would make me hesitant. Also the lenses seem to have the incorrect base tint for both fire, which they say these are, or 24k which the XX had in this colorway. . Those use a brown base whereas these appear to be grey.Hi experts
These are advertised near me, but I have some concerns.
He’s advertised them as Juliets, which I originally put down to a mistake, because the SKU is 04-145 which pertains to a 24k XX model, and as far as I am aware, juliets weren’t available in this colorway.
That’s all great..thought he may have just been confused (although they do look like a Juliet frame to me), but if I’m not mistaken, the arms (if a genuine XX), should be hammers right?
To my untrained eye, they otherwise ‘seem’ ok, they have the split hinge unlike most typical fakes, there are hex screws securing the arms to the frame, however the x-metal logo is missing from the rear of the nose bridge from what I can see.
Any and all input appreciated View attachment 1326156View attachment 1326157View attachment 1326158View attachment 1326159View attachment 1326160View attachment 1326161
Thanks Micah
I didn’t pick up on the lens tint, so that’s another red flag to add to the list.
They seem like a bit of a mish-mash to me. The orbitals (as far as I can tell) look correct for a Juliet, but the nosebridge (no logo) and arms (XX SKU on non-hammers) appear fake.
Appreciate the responseLast edited:
BACK TO FRONT
Oakley Beginner
Hi,
I'm confused about the markings on the temples. specifically, I noticed there is no "Scar" logo on the inner temple. Is this normal for this model?
Thanks！：）
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
