Official Fakes/Possible Fakes Inquiry Thread (ARE THESE FAKE? POST FAKES HERE)

[bucharestian]

hello,

I am confused about this pair of eye jacket 1.0, it looks ancient and well built, but there are some elements that I am not sure about:

- that registered R sign next to the logo on the bridge

- the lack of 'jacket' inscription on the inside of the left arm

what would you say?

 

[Funky-Trixtar]

hello,

I am confused about this pair of eye jacket 1.0, it looks ancient and well built, but there are some elements that I am not sure about:

that registered R sign next to the logo on the biridge

the lack of 'jacket' inscription on the inside of the left arm

what would you say?

View attachment 1330968

View attachment 1330969

View attachment 1330970

Hi, you're in the wrong Thread.

Try here

Official Fakes/Possible Fakes Inquiry Thread (ARE THESE FAKE? POST FAKES HERE)

This thread serves as the consolidated area to inquire whether your Oakley's are fake, potential fakes or real. Post your pictures and include any relevant details. For tips and guides on how to spot fakes based on model, check the link below...

www.oakleyforum.com

 

[Gentian]

They look Minty. Nice!

Hi everyone,

I’m considering buying a pair of Oakley TiO2 and I’d like to ask if anyone here could help me verify whether they look original. Location Switzerland.

Does anyone have experience with this model or know what details I should check to confirm authenticity? I’d also appreciate any additional information about the TiO2 in general.

Thanks in advance for any help.

View attachment 1330260

View attachment 1330261

View attachment 1330262

View attachment 1330263

View attachment 1330264

View attachment 1330265

View attachment 1330266

View attachment 1330267

View attachment 1330268

View attachment 1330269

View attachment 1330270

View attachment 1330271

View attachment 1330272

View attachment 1330273

View attachment 1330274

 

[cheshirecat]

hello,

I am confused about this pair of eye jacket 1.0, it looks ancient and well built, but there are some elements that I am not sure about:

that registered R sign next to the logo on the biridge

the lack of 'jacket' inscription on the inside of the left arm

what would you say?

View attachment 1330968

View attachment 1330969

View attachment 1330970

Definitely original EJ FMJ 5.56 because Eye Jacket Gen 1 always broke at that place. And it has an FMJ coating with ageing.

 

[kmbijit]

hello,

I am confused about this pair of eye jacket 1.0, it looks ancient and well built, but there are some elements that I am not sure about:

that registered R sign next to the logo on the biridge

the lack of 'jacket' inscription on the inside of the left arm

what would you say?

View attachment 1330968

View attachment 1330969

View attachment 1330970

That's in a pathetic state. Why would you consider a broken EJ in the first place?

 

[bucharestian]

That's in a pathetic state. Why would you consider a broken EJ in the first place?

I broke it

 

[ghost.nez]

Hello everyone.
I want to buy my firts juliets, but i dont want to be scammed in the proces.

Can someone help me to legit check this?

VID-20260210-WA0001.mp4

drive.google.com

VID-20260210-WA0002.mp4

drive.google.com

 

[Lopaka KaMars]

Hello everyone.
I want to buy my firts juliets, but i dont want to be scammed in the proces.

Can someone help me to legit check this?

VID-20260210-WA0001.mp4

drive.google.com

VID-20260210-WA0002.mp4

drive.google.com

View attachment 1331468

View attachment 1331469

Looks legit to me.

 

[Msgt Oakley]

Hello everyone.
I want to buy my firts juliets, but i dont want to be scammed in the proces.

Can someone help me to legit check this?

VID-20260210-WA0001.mp4

drive.google.com

VID-20260210-WA0002.mp4

drive.google.com

View attachment 1331468

View attachment 1331469

 

[ghost.nez]

View attachment 1331476

Thanks, i do my homework from the sharjt post, J###### X-Metal / Black Juliet

But I wanted a more experienced opinion