Holbrook XXL and Flak 2.0 XXL

[Oaktreee]

Interesting, I hadn’t noticed that. Thanks for sharing.

Do you have both the XL and XXL?

 

[WildWires]

Do you have both the XL and XXL?

Not right now, I don’t have an original xl/regular flak 2.0.

 

[Oaktreee]

Not right now, I don’t have an original xl/regular flak 2.0.

Okay, but as i said, my brother who is a Oakley expert (by his own words) did order the XXL Flak, and he had hoped they were wider in the stems, but they were not, it's only in the front they are bigger/wider. The ear steam are shorter or at least the same length/width. So if you feel the XL hurt the back of your head after a couple of hours, the XXL will not help.

XXL is only bigger in the front, not in the back..... kinda like Dolly Parton i guess.

But i only saw them briefly , i would like some other members to chime in about the stem length on the Flak XXL

 

[WildWires]

Okay, but as i said, my brother who is a Oakley expert (by his own words) did order the XXL Flak, and he had hoped they were wider in the stems, but they were not, it's only in the front they are bigger/wider. The ear steam are shorter or at least the same length/width. So if you feel the XL hurt the back of your head after a couple of hours, the XXL will not help.

XXL is only bigger in the front, not in the back..... kinda like Dolly Parton i guess.

But i only saw them briefly , i would like some other members to chime in about the stem length on the Flak XXL

I have no idea what you just said, but I wear a cap size 7 5/8 and these fit me better than the original 2.0. Sounds like your brother needs a radar frame, good luck!

 

[Oaktreee]

I have no idea what you just said, but I wear a cap size 7 5/8 and these fit me better than the original 2.0. Sounds like your brother needs a radar frame, good luck!

i was saying the xxl is bigger than the xl, but only in the front, the stems are the same length, so how will it help people with larger heads?

 

[Lumbergh]

The temple length looks the same to me but technically longer on the XL. Pictured is a right temple from both an XXL (top) and XL (bottom). The temple length on the box for an XXL is 131mm and an XL is 133mm.

 

[Oaktreee]

The temple length looks the same to me but technically longer on the XL. Pictured is a right temple from both an XXL (top) and XL (bottom). The temple length on the box for an XXL is 131mm and an XL is 133mm.

View attachment 1252150

So i was not wrong....

Sure XXL are bigger then XL.... but only in the front, not in the back, idiotic IMO

 

[WildWires]

So i was not wrong....

Sure XXL are bigger then XL.... but only in the front, not in the back, idiotic IMO

Have they tried a low bridge fit flak? Those fit a little larger than regular flak 2.0?

 

[Oaktreee]

Have they tried a low bridge fit flak? Those fit a little larger than regular flak 2.0?

what is that?

 

[WildWires]

Here’s a nice thread on the differences, they are basically a little wider and flatter to fit on faces with higher cheek bones, but they fit better on bigger heads too.

Flak 2.0 Asian Fit vs Flak 2.0 XL

Hi everyone, here's a quick comparison of the Flak 2.0 Asian Fit with Jade Polarized lenses and Flak 2.0 XL Deep Water H2O Polarized lenses. I bought these sunglasses for outdoor road running on bright and sunny days. Starting with the fit, the Flak 2.0 Asian fit does not touch my brow, and the...

www.oakleyforum.com