robertwills
Oakley Beginner
- 135
- 93
This person has an Oakley collection. Original cost of everything was $10K. He needs to sell it because he's moving overseas. He says that he will take $2K for it. Another person hears about this and knows someone who would buy it, even at a higher price. He send an email to the buyer and says "The entire collection can be had for $3K. You pay the seller $2K and me $1K as a finder's fee. You agree that my fee is not to change if the deal is to go through".
The buyer emails back "Yes I agree to that but it depends on my actually seeing the collection and determining the quality. Please put me in touch with the seller".
Buyer sees the collection and makes a deal with the seller for $1500.00. The person who put the deal together asks for his fee and the buyer says "We didn't have an agreement. I don't owe you anything".
Do you think the buyer is wrong and in fact owes the person who put the deal together?
The buyer emails back "Yes I agree to that but it depends on my actually seeing the collection and determining the quality. Please put me in touch with the seller".
Buyer sees the collection and makes a deal with the seller for $1500.00. The person who put the deal together asks for his fee and the buyer says "We didn't have an agreement. I don't owe you anything".
Do you think the buyer is wrong and in fact owes the person who put the deal together?
Last edited: