No, I don’t wanna spend that much on glasses anymore.
And to adress the other posters. I can understand that it can be an issue with other people quoting prices. But if it’s new vs old pricing they are obviously daft to quote an old pair for a new pair. I just think it’s the only way to keep pricing at an actual “market price” for here
at the end of the day people either want to sell or they don’t. It’s a buyers market, so if people are firm on their prices they can expect their items to stay listed for a long long time. I personally don’t like paying over original MSPR it I guess it depends on the individual. Stay in there buddy you’ll find what you’re looking for
As someone who has paid for an oem pair of neat-mint gen1 XX Tio2 above msrp, mind you the pair came with a set oem cc lenses (I am willing to pay for all oem); I am of the opinion that leaving the sell price up post-sale acts as a compendium as to what one should expect.
Per the newbies setting the precedent of what, say a Tron should go for is counter to the point, though I’ve seen some variance from around for mint 750-1000 (the latter being of course as of late by said newbies). Of course an aside to those who flip for profit should in my opinion, censor or redact how much they sold for, for obvious reasons.
Mind you, this is an opinion coming from someone whose presence extends only a little over six months, albeit something of an outsider and still looking for a niche in the forum. Anyways I digress.